On August 24, 2024, Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, was unjustly arrested upon his arrival at Le Bourget Airport in France. The arrest came as a shock to many, as Durov appears to be targeted by European authorities solely for his steadfast commitment to privacy and freedom of speech.
Under the guise of alleged criminal activities such as drug trafficking, fraud, and even child pornography, this courageous and purposeful entrepreneur is now being held, with a potential 20-year prison sentence looming over him. But what is really going on here?
The EU: The New Dictators in Disguise
Europe, once a beacon of freedom and democracy, has now become a dystopian nightmare where unelected bureaucrats like Ursula von der Leyen hold the reins of power. These self-proclaimed guardians of "truth" have set their sights on suppressing anyone who dares to challenge them. The arrest of Pavel Durov is the ultimate proof of this. The charges against him are nothing more than a shameless attempt to silence an entrepreneur and freedom of speech fighter.
Pavel Durov: A Heroic Battle Against State Control
Pavel Durov is no stranger to resisting authoritarian regimes. After fleeing Russia due to his refusal to silence opposition groups, he found refuge in Dubai. Now he faces repression once again, this time not from Russia, but from the European Union, which increasingly behaves like a second China.
Telegram, much like Twitter during the Arab Spring, upholds free speech and privacy as its core principles. This makes it a thorn in the side of the establishment, which lacks control over what happens on Telegram. While Twitter was praised in 2010-2011 for its role in toppling regimes unfriendly to the West during the Arabic Spring, Telegram is now vilified because it refuses to comply with the EU’s censorship demands.
The Absurdity of the Charges
The allegations against Durov—ranging from involvement in pedophilia to drug trafficking—are downright absurd and serve as a smokescreen to sabotage his platform.
The real reason behind this attack? The EU wants complete control over all information, even at the expense of fundamental freedoms. Durov has previously been pressured into shutting down channels, like the pro-Palestinian ones Apple demanded be removed. This kind of pressure is purely geopolitically motivated and has nothing to do with justice or safety.
Freedom of Speech: A Threatened Right
The arrest of Durov reveals that privacy and free speech are no longer safe in Europe. The idea that an entrepreneur can only operate if he provides full access to what his users are doing and saying sets a dangerous precedent. The first prison sentences in the UK for "wrong" opinions on social media show that Europe is no better than authoritarian states like China. The West criticized the disappearance of Jack Ma in China after he spoke out against the government, yet now they practice the same tactics on European soil.
Pavel Durov is a Symbol of Freedom for 1 in 7 People Worldwide
What’s at stake here is far more than just the fate of one man. If Pavel Durov becomes the victim of this witch hunt, his over 900 million users—1 in 7 people globally—will also be targeted. Telegram wouldn’t have such a vast user base if these people didn’t resonate with an alternative vision that challenges the establishment.
This demonstrates that a significant portion of the global population disagrees with what France and the EU are doing. This is not just about Durov; it’s a fight against the overwhelming control and censorship that the EU is trying to impose with the E.U.’s Digital Services Act. It’s a battle for freedom of speech, privacy, and the truth.
Will Pavel Durov Become the Next Julian Assange?
The parallels between Pavel Durov and Julian Assange are striking. Just as Assange faced relentless persecution for upholding transparency and exposing uncomfortable truths, Durov now finds himself in a similar position, targeted for his unwavering principles.
Durov, much like Assange, is unlikely to bow to pressure. His commitment to privacy and freedom of speech is steadfast, even in the face of severe consequences. Should Durov be detained long-term, it’s likely that his brother, Nikolai Durov—who co-founded Telegram with him in 2013—will continue the platform’s operations. This ensures that Telegram remains a beacon of free communication, despite the growing threats from powerful governments.
Selective Justice in the Arrest of Pavel Durov: Why Only Target Telegram?
The recent response from CYBERPOL strengthens the argument that the arrest of Pavel Durov is more about political motivations than legitimate law enforcement. While platforms like Facebook, Google, and WhatsApp have also been implicated in illegal activities, they have not faced the same intense scrutiny.
Telegram, founded by Pavel Durov, has been specifically targeted because of its commitment to privacy and encryption, raising concerns about selective justice. CYBERPOL President Ricardo Baretzky highlighted this bias, questioning why only Telegram and its founder are facing such severe legal consequences. This situation points to a worrying trend of governments selectively enforcing laws to suppress platforms that resist surveillance.
Economic Interests Behind Pavel Durov’s Arrest: The Telegram Controversy
Another key point raised by CYBERPOL involves the economic factors possibly influencing Pavel Durov’s arrest. France’s aggressive stance on taxing major tech companies, like Google and Facebook, contrasts with its focus on Telegram, which contributes little in terms of taxation.
Baretzky suggested that France might be using this arrest as a way to pressure Telegram into compliance or as a demonstration of its power over companies that refuse to cooperate. The fact that Pavel Durov has maintained Telegram’s independence from external influences likely makes him a more attractive target for such measures, further questioning the true motivations behind his arrest.
The Broader Impact of Pavel Durov’s Arrest on Privacy and Cybersecurity
The arrest of Pavel Durov also opens up significant questions about the future of privacy, security, and the role of tech companies in a rapidly digitalizing world. CYBERPOL’s involvement highlights how this case could set a dangerous precedent: if Durov is convicted, other tech CEOs may be held personally responsible for user activities on their platforms.
Telegram’s commitment to encryption and privacy could become a focal point for governments aiming to weaken these protections under the guise of combating cybercrime. The world is watching to see whether Pavel Durov’s case will be a catalyst for broader discussions on balancing security and privacy, or merely another example of selective enforcement driven by political agendas.
Support Pavel Durov: A Call to Action
Pavel Durov’s fight is not just his own; it is the fight of everyone who values freedom. It’s time we stand up against the corrupt elite who use false charges and censorship to bend the world to their will. Free Pavel Durov immediately and let the fight for freedom of speech and privacy prevail. Europe must not turn into a repressive system where freedom is stifled and truth is distorted.
Censorship and Corruption Must End
In a time when the ruling powers seek to tighten their grip by targeting freedom fighters like Pavel Durov, it is crucial that we speak out. Support this hero in his fight against injustice, for if Durov is sacrificed on the altar of corruption and control, we will all be next in line.
Comments